This article is my attempt to provide an overview of the
series of posts I have been writing about emancipative values.
A good place to start is by explaining what I mean by an
emancipation ladder. The basic idea is that the opportunities for individuals
to live happy lives are constrained by the circumstances in which they live. The
opportunities available to people on the bottom rung of the ladder are heavily
constrained. They are likely to be illiterate, to live in small communities
with poor communication with the outside world and to be preoccupied with
satisfying basic material needs. As these constraints are lifted, more people
are able to climb to higher rungs of the ladder, where opportunities are
greater. Climbing the ladder may not make our lives blissful, but it emancipates us from the constraints imposed by predation,
persecution and poverty.
The concept of emancipation that I am using here owes a
great deal to Christian Welzel’s book Freedom
Rising, which I reviewed on this blog a few weeks ago. Professor Welzel’s
research suggests that as a consequence of economic development people have tended
to adopt emancipative values - showing more concern about such matters as
personal autonomy, freedom of choice, having a say in community decisions and
equality of opportunity. In an increasing number of societies, larger numbers of people have
come to recognize the value of civic entitlements - such as the right to vote -
and have used their growing material resources, intellectual skills and
opportunities to connect with others to take collective action to achieve such entitlements. The process is ongoing, with greater concern being shown for
opportunities available to ethnic minorities, gender equality, entitlements of
the disabled etc. as material living standards have risen and emancipative
values have strengthened.
However, the people in wealthy countries can expect to
experience great difficulty climbing further up the emancipation ladder if
social norms and ideologies turn against economic development. As societies
become wealthier, economic development becomes less dependent on factories
belching smoke and does not necessarily involve vast property developments that
destroy the natural beauty of the landscape, but it still requires ongoing
advances in technology, innovation and productivity growth. If economic
development ceases we can expect our societies to become meaner, with greater
disputation over whether different groups in the community are getting a fair
share of the national economic cake. (Benjamin Friedman made some valid points
about such matters in his book, The Moral Consequences of Economic Growth, which I discussed here a few years ago.)
My understanding of the economic development process
suggests strongly that the chances of economic development are greatly improved
when prevailing social norms and ideologies support economic freedom i.e. the
rights of individuals to use their resources for purposes they choose, including
endeavours involving the voluntary cooperation of others. As I see it, the most
plausible explanations of why the process of economic development began when
and where it did - in north-eastern Europe a couple of centuries ago - are
those which emphasize changes in norms and ideologies that legitimised
systematic experimentation in the realm of technology as well as in science, and
became more approving of innovation and markets. (For example, the views of
Joel Mokyr and Deidre McCloskey, which I wrote about here.) Research explaining
current differences in per capita incomes in different countries (including
some referred to in another post ) suggests that a strong economic culture – with
emphasis on interpersonal trust, respect for others, individual
self-determination and individualism – is complementary to economic freedom in
fostering economic development.
The relationship between economic freedom, average incomes levels and emancipative values is summarised in the chart below for 54 countries for which comparable data is available.
The relationship between economic freedom, average incomes levels and emancipative values is summarised in the chart below for 54 countries for which comparable data is available.
The question of whether people in wealthy countries will
continue to be able to climb the emancipation ladder hinges on whether their
values will remain sufficiently supportive of economic freedom. Are
emancipative values developing in ways that increasingly emphasize personal
freedom and individual responsibility, or are they morphing into an ‘entitlement
culture’ that will threaten economic freedom and further economic development?
The main points that have emerged from my research are as follows:
- There is evidence that, other things equal, individualistic societies tend to have smaller governments and that countries with high emancipative values tend to be individualistic. See: Do emancipative values support economic freedom?
- There has not been a general tendency for economic freedom to either rise or fall over the last few decades in wealthy countries with rising emancipative values. Economic freedom has fallen in some such countries (e.g. US and Japan) and risen in others (e.g. Sweden and Norway). See: What is the relationship between emancipative values and economic freedom?
- There is evidence that economic freedom tends to rise in countries with a strong economic growth ideology i.e. where people consider economic growth should have high priority as a national aim and have attitudes favourable to scientific advances. See: Can we identify the characteristics of national ideologies that promote economic freedom?
- There is evidence that the priority given to economic growth has risen in some wealthy countries (Sweden and the US) in response to economic crises. See: How have attitudes towards economic growth changed since the1990s?
- There is not a consistent tendency for people with high emancipative values to give lower priority to economic growth than do other people in high income countries. See: Do people with strong emancipative values give lower priority to economic growth?
The results of this research provide some grounds for
optimism that wealthy countries will maintain sufficiently high levels of economic freedom to enable their citizens to continue to climb
the emancipation ladder. However, as I see it, actual outcomes are likely to depend on the quality of the political institutions that have evolved in different countries.